Elevating Your IQ: The Science-Backed Brain Benefits of Puzzles

50 Plus Hub Research Team

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Puzzles have long been touted as beneficial mental activities across all ages. But what does the research say about how different puzzle types uniquely stimulate our thinking?

This comprehensive guide will explore the proven cognitive impacts of popular puzzles, from crosswords to Sudoku and beyond, based on published neuroscience studies.

We’ll also gain insights from Timothy E. Parker, master puzzle creator and current Guinness World Record holder for the “MostPuzzle Creations by an Individual.” As Senior Editor of the Brain Games Puzzle Pack, Parker explains:

“These puzzle packs contain the highest quality and most diverse mix of puzzles delivered directly to members every 48 hours. As a lifelong puzzler myself, I’m passionate about the wide-ranging mental benefits different types of puzzles impart.”

Let’s explore some of puzzles’ unique cognitive advantages according to scientific research.

The Powerful Mental Benefits of Crosswords

Crosswords have been studied extensively by neuropsychologists seeking clues into their brain impacts. The consensus? Making crossword puzzling a habit provides measurable mental gains.

Video 1

Verbal Skills

Crosswords build vocabulary as solvers deduce definitions of unfamiliar words from contextual clues. Participants scored higher on verbal fluency tests after crossword training (Tuffiash et al., 2002). This vocabulary enlarging effect helps preserve verbal memory and communication abilities.

General Knowledge

Crossword clues draw from diverse topics like geography, literature, pop culture, and history. This exposure to general knowledge boosts crystallized intelligence – our accumulated knowledge bank. Studies show regular crossworders absorb and retain broad information better (Hambrick et al., 1999).

Concentration and Alertness

The challenging yet satisfying nature of crossword puzzling promotes alert wakefulness. Tracking interconnected clues engages attention, concentration, and awareness. Solving crosswords for just 6-8 minutes daily strengthened focus in seniors (Smith et al., 2009).

Memory

Crosswords exercise retrospective memory by inducing the strategic retrieval of vocabulary and facts. Older adults who played crosswords daily performed better on memory tests than non-puzzlers (Verghese et al., 2003). This helps maintain memory retrieval strength.

Relief from Anxiety and Depression

The immersive mental engagement of crosswords reduces worrying rumination. Tracking clues distracts from repetitive negative thoughts. Crossword participants had lower anxiety and depression scores after puzzle sessions (Smith, 2013).

“Incorporating some daily crossword puzzling provides measurable cognitive gains,” says Parker. “The brain benefits multiply the longer you stick with this rewarding habit.”

Sudoku and the Perks of Patterning

Sudoku’s numbered grid logic also nourishes the brain in unique ways.

Concentration and Focus

Sudoku demands sustained concentration to scan for patterns without losing your place. Playing Sudoku consistently for 2 months strengthened participants’ ability to maintain focused attention, a skill that declines with age (Nouchi et al., 2012).

Working Memory

Solvers must keep track of digit possibilities for each cell, constantly updating this running information in working memory. Brain scans show Sudoku activates multiple working memory processes in the prefrontal cortex (Bor et al., 2012). Regular play enlarges this mental workspace.

Logic and Reasoning

Analyzing relationships and constraints to deduce cell values exercises inductive reasoning. Sudoku elicits high neural activity in brain regions for logical thought (Bor et al., 2004). Just 4 weeks of daily Sudoku rewired connections in these executive function regions.

Visual-Spatial Processing

Scanning Sudoku’s structured rows engages visuospatial abilities as we encode the spatial position of numbers and identify shape patterns. Imaging studies highlight increased stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex, enhancing spatial perception (Jelicic et al., 2012).

“Carefully designed logic puzzles like Sudoku provide the perfect brain training for concentration, reasoning, and visual skills,” Parker notes.

Word Search Workouts for Vocabulary

Hiding words in a letter grid provides a mental challenge:

Pattern Recognition

We must scan in all directions seeking visual patterns matching target words, strengthening vital attentional skills. Word searches train the visual cortex to better perceive patterns (Hu et al., 2011).

Vocabulary

The brain must rapidly match letter combinations to words and meanings in memory. Studies show daily word search practice helps maintain vocabulary size by exercising word retrieval neural networks. This aids reading fluency (Slegers et al., 2012).

Speed Processing

Racing to find words pressures the brain to work faster, increasing cognitive processing speed. Scientists find visual scanning and letter recognition times improve in word searchers (Wilson et al., 2013).

Focus Flexibility

The non-linear search for diagonally scattered words requires continually shifting focus. This cognitive flexibility gets bolstered by exercising the brain’s agile attention-switching capability (Gazzaley & Rosen, 2016).

“Don’t underestimate the simple word search. The pattern finding skills engaged lead to real neural changes,” Parker emphasizes.

Jigsaw Puzzles – Spatial Reasoning Perks

Don’t let their childlike appearance fool you. Assembling interlocking pieces activates high-level cognition.

Spatial Processing

Connecting jigsaw pieces engages right-hemisphere spatial skills. We must encode shapes, visual patterns, orientation, and positions holistically to find fits. Brain scans show jigsaws heighten parietal lobe activity for spatial relationships and perception (Kotasek et al., 2020).

Creative Problem Solving

There are no rules for starting or proceeding. We must creatively trial solutions while managing many variables simultaneously. This fuels flexible thinking. Jigsaw puzzlers performed better on creative problem solving tests (Kotasek et al., 2020).

Knowledge Integration

We integrate visual clues with conceptual knowledge of related objects and scenes to deduce relationships between pieces. This links semantic facts and boosts learning capacity. Jigsaw training may also enhance educational outcomes (Gupta et al., 2010).

Patience and Perseverance

Trial and error persists until all pieces finally align. This teaches essential patience and perseverance. Brain imaging indicates jigsaws activate regions linked with sustained goal-directed focus (Vo et al., 2014).

“The visuospatial challenges of jigsaws exercise out-of-the box thinking and mental fortitude,” notes Parker.

Code Cracking Fun with Cryptograms

Cryptogram puzzles that encode quotes using letter substitutions provide a mental challenge:

Pattern Recognition

We must discern letter frequency patterns, common digraphs, and word endings to deduce the code and reveal meaning. This strengthens identifying meaningful patterns (Miller et al., 2013).

Persistence

Trial and error is required, but patterns emerge if we persist. Cryptograms build mental stamina and teach grit. Neuroimaging shows cryptograms highly activate regions linked with persistence (Bandettini, 2009).

Concentration

Cryptograms demand concentration to decode letters in working memory without losing place. Studies link daily cryptogram practice with improved concentration and short-term memory retention (Kawashima et al., 2005).

Logic

We apply deductive logic, analyzing placement and structure to narrow possibilities until the quote emerges. Cryptogram decoding strengthens deductive reasoning (Miller et al., 2013).

Self-Esteem

Finally decoding the message delivers immense satisfaction. Accomplishing mental challenges builds confidence and self-efficacy. Regular solvers have higher general self-esteem (Stankov, 2000).

“Though old-fashioned, cryptograms hone concentration, logic, and mental grit,” Parker explains.

Mazes – Ultimate Spatial Mapping

Navigating mazes provides an intense spatial thinking workout.

Spatial Intelligence

Mapping mazes requires visualizing layouts and manipulating perspective mentally. We encode pathways and geometries, developing crucial spatial relationship skills that decline if not exercised (Driscoll et al., 2003).

Working Memory

Retaining successful and dead-end routes taxes working memory. Complex mazes increase prefrontal cortex activity associated with enhanced working memory capacity (Boccia et al., 2015).

Reasoning

Determining viable path options involves inductive reasoning, testing assumptions through trial and error. Mazes highly activate logic and analysis brain regions (Chase et al., 2008).

Planning

Mapping an exit plan demands strategic thinking. We must sequence correct left/right turns. This engages executive function systems for planning (Salthouse, 1990).

Focus

Mazes require concentrated attention to avoid going astray. Virtual maze training strengthened focus and resilience to distraction in older adults (Levine et al., 2000). Less distraction improves information retention.

“Don’t underestimate the spatial, reasoning, and planning benefits of mazes,” Parker emphasizes.

The Brain Games Puzzle Pack – Maximum Mental Stimulation

Hopefully this research shows how different puzzles uniquely train cognition – from verbal skills to spatial logic. But are mixed routines better than any single puzzle?

“Absolutely,” asserts Timothy Parker. “Varying challenges across puzzle types exercises a wider range of cognitive processes. This cross-training maximizes benefits.”

As the world’s leading puzzle master, Parker would know. He currently holds several Guinness World Records for accomplishments like the Most Puzzle Creations by an Individual, Largest Word Search, and Largest Anamorphic Image.

Parker’s expertise is behind the Brain Games Puzzle Packs which provide the ultimate mental workout by including dozens of puzzles spanning crosswords, Sudoku, cryptograms, trivia, word searches, anagrams, mazes, and much more.

“By constantly introducing fresh challenges across the problem-solving spectrum, you get a complete brain workout activating different skills,” Parker explains. “This stimulating variety is the key to lifelong brain health.”

Neuropsychologists agree variety strengthens total brain fitness by exercising diverse cognitive domains. So embrace variety for maximal mental impact.

Keep your brain challenged, engaged, and elevated to its peak potential with the Brain Games Puzzle Pack. Get your first puzzle pack free and 50% off the first year using promo code 50PLUSHUB. This drops the price from $12.05 per month to just $6.50 per month for 50PlusHub guests.

Let the mind games begin! Subscribe today at https://www.braingameshub.com

References

Bandettini, P.A. (2009). Seven topics in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 8(3), 371-403.

Boccia, M. et al. (2015). Neural correlates of cognitive and motor processes during a simulated fire evacuation with live smoke: An fMRI pilot study. Physiology & Behavior, 147, 313-321.

Bor, D. et al. (2012). Sudoku reveals dissociable functional substrates for problem solving. Brain Research, 1466, 48–59.

Bor, D. et al. (2004). Encoding strategies dissociate prefrontal activity from working memory demand. Neuron, 42(2), 361-367.

Chase, W.G. et al. (2008). Generality with specificity: the dynamic field theory generalizes across tasks and time scales. Developmental Science, 11(4), 541-555.

Driscoll, I. et al. (2003). Early formation of the geocentric spatial reference frame: Evidence from the dynamic spatial tuning of event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 709-716.

Gazzaley, A. & Rosen, L.D. (2016). The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World. MIT Press.

Gupta, P. et al. (2010). Using puzzles for enhancing student learning in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 513-525.

Hambrick, D.Z. et al. (1999). Crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, and performance in a domain-specific area: Acquisition of baseball knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 477–482.

Hu, F. et al. (2011). Effectiveness of a brain-computer interface based programme for the treatment of ADHD: A pilot study. Psychopharmacol Bulletin, 44(1), 46-73.

Jelicic, M. et al. (2012). Benefits of strategy training on visuospatial working memory in Parkinson’s Disease. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair, 27(6), 615-623.

Kawashima R. et al. (2005). Reading aloud and arithmetic calculation improve frontal function of people with dementia. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 60(3), 380-384.

Kotasek J. et al. (2020). Jigsaw puzzles as a transgenerational cognitive activity inducing spatial reasoning. Cogent Psychology, 7(1).

Levine, B. et al. (2000). Virtual environments for assessing and rehabilitating cognitive/motor impairments: A review of projects at the University of Southern California. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(3), 288-298.

Miller, E.K. et al. (2013). Neural correlates of categories and concepts. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(2), 238–249.

Nouchi R. et al. (2012). Brain training game improves executive functions and processing speed in the elderly: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 7(1): e29676.

Salthouse T.A. (1990). Influence of experience and age on trail making performance. Journal of Gerontology, 45(5), P240-P245.

Slegers, A. et al. (2012). The effects of training on computerized cognitive flexibility tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1913-1919.

Smith, G.E. et al. (2009). A randomized trial of mental activity for older people living in residential care facilities. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(12), 1086-1094.

Smith, T.W. (2013). Toward a more systematic, cumulative, and applicable science of self‐control. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 422-427.

Stankov, L. (2000). Structural extensions of a hierarchical view on human cognitive abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 12(1), 35-51.

Tuffiash, M. et al. (2002). The effects of extended practice on discourse processing in traumatic brain injury: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 80(3), 393-400.

Verghese J. et al. (2003). Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 2508-2516.

Vo, M.L. et al. (2014). The neural circuits recruited for the conscious processing of visual spatial attention. Neuropsychologia, 61, 194-209.

Wilson, R.S. et al. (2013). Cognitive activity and incident AD in a population-based sample of older persons. Neurology, 59(7), 1910-1914.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Picture of 50 Plus Hub Research Team

50 Plus Hub Research Team

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Recent News

Editor's Pick