Daily brief   for adults 50+ 登録する AM & PM email
50 Plus HubEverything for Everyone 50+
Customize ➞ My age is in the: 50s 60s 70s 80+ Text size 言語
‹ Back to Breaking News
us

DA in Cornell Case Never Saw Interview Transcript

Wednesday, September 30, 2026 · 2 sources

Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten stated that he never saw a transcript of a conversation between an alleged rape victim and investigators. This conversation occurred before his office decided not to bring charges in the Cornell University case.

Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten says he never saw a transcript of a conversation between an alleged rape victim and investigators. This transcript showed what the victim told Cornell University campus police before his office decided not to bring charges. The case involves an alleged rape that occurred on the Cornell University campus. According to District Attorney Van Houten, his office made the decision not to bring charges without reviewing the transcript of the victim's conversation with investigators. The details of the case and the investigation are still being examined. District Attorney Van Houten's statement has raised questions about the handling of the case. The decision not to bring charges was made after the investigation was completed. The alleged rape victim had spoken to campus police, and a transcript of that conversation was made. However, District Attorney Van Houten claims he never saw this transcript. The case is being closely watched, and the community is awaiting further information. The investigation and the decision not to bring charges have sparked interest and concern. As more information becomes available, the public will be informed about the developments in the case.

Go Deeper

What is the Cornell case about?

The Cornell case involves an alleged rape that occurred on the Cornell University campus. The details of the case are still being examined, but it is known that the alleged victim spoke to campus police and a transcript of the conversation was made.

Why did the DA's office decide not to bring charges?

The DA's office decided not to bring charges after completing the investigation, but the exact reasons for this decision are not yet clear. It is known that the decision was made without reviewing the transcript of the victim's conversation with investigators.

What has the DA said about the case?

District Attorney Matthew Van Houten has stated that he never saw the transcript of the conversation between the alleged rape victim and investigators. This statement has raised questions about the handling of the case.

Is the case still being investigated?

The investigation appears to be complete, and the decision not to bring charges has been made. However, the case is still being closely watched, and the community is awaiting further information.

What happens next in the case?

As more information becomes available, the public will be informed about the developments in the case. The community is awaiting further details about the investigation and the decision not to bring charges.