Daily brief   for adults 50+ Subscribe AM & PM email
50 Plus HubEverything for Everyone 50+
Customize My age is in the: 50s 60s 70s 80+ Text size
‹ Back to Breaking News
politics50+

Appeals Court Rules on South Carolina Mail-in Voting Law

Sunday, August 30, 2026 · 6 sources

A federal appeals court has ruled that South Carolina's mail-in ballot law violates the 26th Amendment. The state plans to appeal the decision to a higher court.

A federal appeals court has struck down a portion of South Carolina's mail-in voting law, ruling that it illegally discriminates against younger voters. The law in question exempted voters over 65 from providing a witness signature on mail-in ballots, but the court found this exemption to be a violation of the 26th Amendment, which protects the voting rights of citizens aged 18 to 64.

The state of South Carolina plans to appeal this decision further, indicating that the issue is not yet resolved. According to the court's ruling, the age-based exemption is no longer valid, and the state will need to revisit its mail-in voting laws to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

The 26th Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 and prohibits the federal government and the states from denying the right to vote to citizens 18 years old or older.

The 50+ takeaway: Voting rules may change.

Go Deeper

What is the 26th Amendment?

The 26th Amendment is a part of the US Constitution that lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 and prohibits the federal government and the states from denying the right to vote to citizens 18 years old or older.

Why did the court rule against South Carolina's mail-in voting law?

The court ruled that the law's exemption for voters over 65 illegally discriminates against younger voters, violating the 26th Amendment.

What happens next in the case?

The state of South Carolina plans to appeal the decision to a higher court, which means the issue is not yet resolved and may be revisited in the future.

How does this ruling affect mail-in voting in South Carolina?

The ruling means that the state's mail-in voting law will need to be revised to comply with federal regulations and ensure that all voters, regardless of age, are treated equally.

What is the significance of the court's decision?

The court's decision highlights the importance of protecting the voting rights of all citizens, regardless of age, and ensures that states comply with federal regulations to prevent discrimination in the voting process.