Judge Lifts Nationwide Block on Trump's Mail Voting Order
A federal judge has removed a nationwide ban on President Trump's mail-in voting policy after the Supreme Court cleared the way earlier this week. The decision removes the last major legal obstacle to the administration's plan, though court challenges are ongoing.
US District Judge Indira Talwani lifted her preliminary injunction on President Trump's mail-in voting policy on Wednesday. This decision comes after the Supreme Court made a ruling in a separate case earlier this week. Judge Talwani cited the Supreme Court's decision in her order to vacate the injunction.
The Supreme Court's decision determined it was too soon to decide if states had suffered any injury from the executive order. The court stated that federal courts review final rules, not proposed rules, and that if the Postal Service's final rule harms states, they may challenge that rule. The Postal Service has since published its final rule, which has triggered another lawsuit from a group of states.
Judge Talwani's order was without prejudice, meaning plaintiffs can amend their complaint and seek a new injunction. The decision removes the last major legal obstacle to the administration's plan, though court challenges are ongoing.
The case is related to President Trump's executive order on mail-in voting, which has been the subject of several lawsuits. The Supreme Court's decision and Judge Talwani's order are the latest developments in the ongoing legal battle over the policy.
Go Deeper
What was the Supreme Court's decision in the separate case?
The Supreme Court determined it was too soon to decide if states had suffered any injury from the executive order and stated that federal courts review final rules, not proposed rules.
What is the status of the lawsuits challenging the mail-in voting policy?
The lawsuits are ongoing, with a group of states filing a new lawsuit after the Postal Service published its final rule.
What does Judge Talwani's order mean for the plaintiffs?
Judge Talwani's order was without prejudice, meaning plaintiffs can amend their complaint and seek a new injunction.
What is the Postal Service's role in the mail-in voting policy?
The Postal Service has published its final rule, which has triggered another lawsuit from a group of states.
What are the next steps in the legal battle over the mail-in voting policy?
The next steps will depend on the outcome of the ongoing lawsuits and any further decisions made by the courts or the administration.
More politics
politicsAccused 9/11 Mastermind to Stand Trial in 2028
The accused mastermind of the 9/11 attacks is set to stand trial in 2028. The trial date was announced in an order issued on Wednesday.
Aug 27
politicsMeta Agrees to $18 Billion Settlement Over Facebook and Instagram Use by Kids
Meta has reached a settlement with attorneys general from across the country, agreeing to pay over $18 billion and implement changes to protect kids a
Aug 27
politicsDolly Parton's Imagination Library Reaches Millions of Children
Dolly Parton's Imagination Library has given out millions of free books to children. The program aims to promote literacy and a love of reading in you
Aug 26