Daily brief   for adults 50+ Subscribe AM & PM email
50 Plus HubEverything for Everyone 50+
Customize My age is in the: 50s 60s 70s 80+ Text size
‹ Back to Breaking News
us50+

Texas Gov. Abbott orders state agencies to halt funding for Flock cameras

Saturday, August 29, 2026 · 3 sources

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott directed state agencies to stop funding AI-powered Flock license plate cameras amid privacy concerns and reported misuse. The Texas Tribune found that a state auto-insurance fee had already put at least $30 million into expanding the camera network.

AUSTIN, Texas - Gov. Greg Abbott ordered Texas state agencies to pause funding for Flock Safety cameras, the AI-powered license plate readers that have spread across highways and city streets, Fox News and the Texas Tribune reported Friday.

Abbott spokesman Andrew Mahaleris said most Flock cameras in Texas are used by cities and that cities are increasingly canceling contracts. He said that to the extent Texas agencies provide funding, those agencies are clarifying the money cannot be used for Flock cameras. Most remaining local funding, he said, comes from the federal government.

The Texas Tribune reported that the Motor Vehicle Crime Prevention Authority, whose board is mostly appointed by Abbott, has devoted at least $30 million from a $1 annual auto-insurance fee hike toward building the Flock network since 2023. The fee was sold as a tool against catalytic converter theft. The Tribune said the authority helped place at least 3,200 Flock cameras, with nearly 1,200 more tied to a $15.9 million Department of Public Safety contract.

Scrutiny rose after reports of police misuse and after a Lufkin officer was indicted on 100 felony counts tied to alleged abuse of Flock data. Communities including Wylie and Hood County have canceled or declined to renew contracts. Dallas police say more than 670 cameras operate in that city alone.

Abbott said in a Friday radio interview that a crackdown is underway as residents press privacy concerns. His office did not immediately list every grant program affected or say whether money already awarded must be clawed back.

Flock markets the cameras as a tool to find stolen cars and catch violent offenders. Critics say networked plate reads create a de facto travel log without a warrant. That tension is now playing out in city halls from Dallas to Houston, where some cameras have already been vandalized.

For drivers, the practical question is local: whether city councils keep, cover or remove the cameras once state subsidy stops.

The 50+ takeaway: State grant money is paused. Cities can still fund cameras locally or with federal dollars unless they cancel contracts.

Go Deeper

What did Abbott order?

State agencies must pause or stop using their funds for Flock cameras.

How was the network funded?

A $1 auto-insurance fee increase helped the Motor Vehicle Crime Prevention Authority put at least $30 million into Flock grants.

Do cities have to remove cameras?

Not automatically. They can still pay locally or with federal money unless they cancel contracts.

Why the backlash?

Privacy groups and residents warn the readers can track everyday driving. Reports of misuse and a Lufkin indictment added pressure.

How many cameras are out there?

The Tribune counted at least 3,200 installed with state help, plus large city systems such as Dallas with more than 670.