Daily brief   for adults 50+ Subscribe AM & PM email
50 Plus HubEverything for Everyone 50+
Customize My age is in the: 50s 60s 70s 80+ Text size Language
‹ Back to Breaking News
politics

DOJ Withdraws Subpoenas Against New York Times Journalists

Thursday, July 23, 2026 · 6 sources

The Justice Department has withdrawn subpoenas issued to New York Times reporters over their reporting on security concerns regarding the new Air Force One jet. The decision was announced during a hearing in a Manhattan courtroom.

The Justice Department announced on Thursday that it would withdraw subpoenas issued to several New York Times reporters earlier this month. The subpoenas were related to the reporters' coverage of security concerns surrounding the new Air Force One jet gifted by Qatar. The development came during a hearing in a Manhattan courtroom, where Judge Arun Subramanian was considering the matter. The hearing was part of a process to determine whether to compel the journalists to testify about their sources. By withdrawing the subpoenas, the Justice Department has ended its effort to obtain information from the reporters. The New York Times had previously reported on potential security risks associated with the new Air Force One jet. The decision to withdraw the subpoenas brings an end to this particular dispute between the Justice Department and the New York Times. The case highlights the ongoing tension between the government's need to protect sensitive information and the press's right to report on matters of public interest. The Justice Department's decision may set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.

Go Deeper

Why were the subpoenas issued in the first place?

The subpoenas were issued because the Justice Department was seeking information about the sources used by New York Times reporters in their coverage of security concerns surrounding the new Air Force One jet.

What is the significance of the new Air Force One jet?

The new Air Force One jet was gifted by Qatar, and there have been reports about potential security risks associated with the aircraft.

Who was the judge presiding over the hearing?

The hearing was presided over by Judge Arun Subramanian in a Manhattan courtroom.

What does the withdrawal of the subpoenas mean for the reporters?

The withdrawal of the subpoenas means that the reporters will not be compelled to testify about their sources, and the Justice Department will not pursue the matter further.

What are the implications of this case for press freedom?

The case highlights the ongoing tension between the government's need to protect sensitive information and the press's right to report on matters of public interest, and the decision may set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.